JustLinux? Linux Today?
The name doesn't fit when articles are posted that have nothing to do with Linux and promote upgrading to a newer version of Windows:
http://linuxtoday.com/infrastructure...42900526OSSVNT
C'mon more Linux, less Microsoft. It seems 25% of the headlines have Microsoft in them which is great free advertising for M$.
I complained about the content of the article in the comments and the managing editor more or less flamed me about it:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php...-OS-SV-NT-0003
It is true that Apache is Open Source (although not GPL, not that it matters in this case) and I think Apache+PHP are outstanding projects. It is true that Linux is also Open Source, but Linux and Open Source are not synonymous.Quote:
Clue: Apache-->Open Source. Something we also cover from time to time.
That article explains how to install Apache+PHP on proprietary Windows and having no reference to Linux whatsoever, in fact states if you are on Win9x you should upgrade to WinNT/2k/XP. ??? This is just not something I would expect to see, nor do I want to see, on "linuxtoday.com" or "justlinux.com".
If the article had been about configuring Apache on Linux then it would be perfectly appropriate. The article in it's entirety would have been perfectly appropriate on "apachetoday.com" but not on "justlinux.com" or "linuxtoday.com" in my opinion. Maybe I'm off base but I would like to hear other's opinions.
If you are censored here you can respond in a thread on my forum:
http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net/forums...354&highlight=
I'm not saying that you would be censored here but the comments on linuxtoday.com take about 24 hours in my experience to get through the censor filter and my last response never did make it (which was much lighter than my original comment). I don't know, maybe I'm just too sensitive about it...