Search:

you are missing the point ( or you simply don't want to see the fact that they and simply using the code viewing as a media ploy ).

I guess you might see things different if your money and time...

I supose I can say I have proof the moon is made of green cheese but only show the cheese collected at the price of a non-disclosure Agreement. Print it on ZDnet and you will beleive that?

now...

tell me how would you try going about forcing a company like IBM to buy you out?

Why do you think they uped the anti to 3 billion after IBM basically flicked them off.

look at oracles 1.5...

that is the game SCO is playing.

they want to raise question so that they can spead FUD. They are not trying to prove they are right. they know they're wrong. but as long as they can spread fud...

hop-frog,
you sound like a doom sayer from the monty python movie "the life of brian".

the Fact is neither can SCO prove that the code they are displaying is infact their own code. SCO realizes...

Hop frog,
you are not looking at the situation from the proper perspective.
simply put:

the burden of proof falls on SCO.
not IBM nor the Linux community.

IBM lawyers know this.